BINDING FINANCIAL AGREEMENT PROS AND CONS
A binding financial agreement could be beneficial to partners with many solely owned assets.
Written by
Invested In You
This is why our professional services go well beyond tax compliance and corporate accounting services. At Curve Accountants, our comprehensive approach is designed to present you with proactive, tailored advice that allows you to make smart financial decisions. From strategies for managing wealth and minimising tax to succession planning and business restructuring, we are committed to offering advice tailored to your unique situation.
A binding financial agreement is similar to a prenuptial agreement. It is a contract between a married or de facto couple that sets out how their finances will be separated if their relationship ends.
The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) contains a provision which facilitates this agreement.
This financial agreement can be made before, during and after the marriage or de facto relationship. But for it to be legally binding, both parties must sign it and have acquired legal advice prior to doing so. The legal advisor should inform parties of the advantages and disadvantages of such an agreement and sign a certificate which states that advice was provided to the parties.
The agreement can cover the division of property and finances, financial support, maintenance of one party after the breakdown of the relationship, and any incidental issues.
The most common reason to enter such a financial agreement is to protect assets an individual owned before getting into the relationship. This allows a distinction between personal and jointly owned assets. Such an agreement also allows parties to protect future income that they may receive through inheritances or investments.
Any allocation of debts such as loans or mortgages can also be made under this agreement, preventing shared liability for a personally owned asset. A comprehensive agreement will reduce costly court proceedings by minimising conflict if the relationship fails.
It may be difficult to discuss such an agreement, especially at the start of a marital or de facto relationship but it is ideal for partners who prefer to keep ownership and responsibilities of their assets separated.
Helpful tip:
Before entering into a Binding Financial Agreement, ensure both parties fully understand its legal and financial implications. Obtain independent legal advice to confirm the agreement is appropriate for your circumstances. Reviewing the agreement after significant life changes can also be beneficial.
BERIVAN DUBIER
DIRECTOR
Reviewed by

SEAN DWYER
Edited by

Alix Dower
PRACTICE MANAGER
Free eBook Download

Starting A Medical Practice
David has extensive experience in writing, editing and marketing before joining iSelect in 2023 as Digital Editor. When not making our content better, you can find them browsing log cabins for sale in the forest.
REQUEST DOWNLOAD

Buying An Established Medical Practice
REQUEST DOWNLOAD
FAQ
What is a binding financial agreement?
A financial agreement, often called a binding financial agreement (BFA), is a contract made under the Family Law Act by a married or de facto couple about financial matters. Depending on its terms, it can set out what happens to specified assets, liabilities, superannuation or maintenance if the relationship ends. Its legal effect depends on meeting the statutory requirements.
When can a couple make a financial agreement?
Can an agreement protect a business, inheritance or assets I owned before the relationship?
It can record how the parties intend those assets and any future growth or income to be treated. This may give both people more certainty and reduce later disputes, particularly where a business, trust or inheritance is involved. It does not guarantee that an asset will be immune from every future claim; clear drafting, accurate financial information and valid execution matter.
Do both people need their own lawyers?
Can a financial agreement allocate debts or divide superannuation?
Can a court set aside a signed financial agreement?
How is a financial agreement different from consent orders?
A financial agreement is a contract made outside court and requires independent legal advice for each party. Consent orders are terms the parties ask the court to make into orders; they can often be sought without a hearing. The court considers proposed consent orders, while it does not approve a financial agreement when the parties sign it. A lawyer can help compare the options for the particular settlement.
How can an accountant help when a couple is considering an agreement?
Related Blogs
Find Out How Curve Accountants Can Help


